Legal Opinion

Heberle v. PRO Liquidating Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 1966No. H-200PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

186 So.2d 280 (1966)

Clement K. HEBERLE, Appellant,

v.

P. R. O. LIQUIDATING COMPANY, Formerly Known As Profexray, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation, and Anderson Surgical Supply Co., Appellees.

No. H-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

May 10, 1966.

Raymond, Wilson, Karl & Conway, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Green & Strasser, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

RAWLS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Heberle has filed this interlocutory appeal from an order quashing service of process on defendant P.R.O. Liquidating Co., an Illinois corporation.

In 1950 Heberle, as osteopathic physician,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ogdon v. GianakosIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. City of Lakeland v. CatinellaSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Davis v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Ake v. ChanceySupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  5. Cunningham v. State Plant Board of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Trustees of Tufts College v. Triple R. Ranch, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1973
  4. Harmon Ex Rel. Harmon v. EudailySuperior Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Milton v. LeapaiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API