Legal Opinion

Oglesby v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 22, 2023No. 3:20-cv-00346Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TAWANNA OGLESBY, . Plaintiff, V. Case No. 3:20-cv-346 FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE JUDGE WALTER H. RICE SYSTEM, INC., et al., Defendants. ° DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.’S MOTION TO STRIKE RULE 23 ALLEGATIONS (DOC. #58); DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE RULE 23 ALLEGATIONS FROM COUNT I] OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS SUSTAINED AND PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 23 (d)(1)(D) PLAINTIFF IS ORDERED TO AMEND HER AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. #30) WITHIN 14 DAYS…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Pilgrim v. Universal Health Card, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API