Ahl v. Arnio
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
Defendants, David and Kay Arnio (David and Kay), appeal from summary judgment entered against them in a quiet title action. We reverse and remand.
In May of 1964, Arnold and Hazel Arnio (Arnold and Hazel), entered into a purchase contract to sell real property in Lawrence County, South Dakota, to Ted and Ruth Ahl (Ahls). The property was described in the contract as follows: “A tract of ground comprising approximately two acres situated on the north side of the C.B. & Q. Railroad tracks starting approximately four hundred feet east of the Arnold Arnio residence, being located…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Ward v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Salmon v. BradshawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Grigsby v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Limpert v. BailSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Fanning v. IversenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Stern Oil Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Piner v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.