Legal Opinion

Ahl v. Arnio

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1986No. 14900PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Defendants, David and Kay Arnio (David and Kay), appeal from summary judgment entered against them in a quiet title action. We reverse and remand.

In May of 1964, Arnold and Hazel Arnio (Arnold and Hazel), entered into a purchase contract to sell real property in Lawrence County, South Dakota, to Ted and Ruth Ahl (Ahls). The property was described in the contract as follows: “A tract of ground comprising approximately two acres situated on the north side of the C.B. & Q. Railroad tracks starting approximately four hundred feet east of the Arnold Arnio residence, being located…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ward v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Salmon v. BradshawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Grigsby v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Limpert v. BailSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fanning v. IversenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Stern Oil Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Piner v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API