Legal Opinion
Piner v. Jensen
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1994No. 18552PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
This is an appeal of a determination of fraudulent conveyance of property on summary judgment motion. Transferee appeals claiming genuine issues of material fact exist. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS 1
On June 21,1980, Dennis Ashwili (Ashwill) acquired 1400 acres in Sanborn County, South Dakota, on a Contract for Deed from LeRoy and Rose Marie Duke (Duke Contract). The Duke Contract provided that Ashwill would not obtain marketable title from the Dukes until he made the last payment, which was due April 1, 1996. Under the terms of the Duke Contract, Ashwill had the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Koeniguer v. EckrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Sporleder v. Van LiereSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bosse v. QuamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.