Legal Opinion

Litzler v. CC Investments, L.D.C.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 2004No. 03-5022PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge.

This interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is taken from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Heller-stein, J.) denying a motion to dismiss, as time-barred, a claim under Section 16 of the Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b). The security transactions at issue were made by equity shareholders who were subject to Section 16 only if they constituted a “group” for the purposes of assessing their collective beneficial ownership interest. The shareholders (apparently because they disputed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Bowers v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. Tribune Company Tribune New York Holdings, Inc., Now Merged With Wpix Inc. v. Hamid AbiolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Credit Suisse Securities (Usa) LLC v. SimmondsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Simmonds v. Credit Suisse Securities LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. At Home Corp. v. Cox Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. In Re Section 16 (B) LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  5. Litzler v. Cc InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API