Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1992No. 17946PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

A jury found the defendant, Jack Scott Howell, guilty of the class C felony of tampering in the first degree, § 569.080.-1(2), RSMo 1986. Because the defendant was a prior offender, the trial court assessed punishment at four years’ imprisonment. He appeals; we affirm.

ISSUES ON APPEAL

The defendant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court committed prejudicial error when it denied the defendant’s motion for mistrial, a motion based on his claim that one of the prosecutor’s questions and the response it elicited from a police officer constituted an impermissible…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. StuartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. State v. TimsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. MacKMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. FutoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API