Cleveland Nat. Bank v. Bickel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Pawnee County; Geo. B. Merritt, Judge. Action by the Cleveland National Bank against A. B. Biekel and another.' Judgment for plaintiff against defendant Biekel, and judgment for defendant W. H. A. Williams, and the Bank appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BUREORD, C.
This was an action on a promissory note executed after (bo passage of (ho Negotiable Instruments Act in this state. The note was signed by A. E. Biekel and W. II. A. Williams as principals. There was nothing on the face of the note to indicate that either was a surety. Bach defendant answered, setting up that the note had been paid by the taking of a subsequent note and mortgage from a party by the name of Wilson. Williams, in addition. answered that ho was a surety on the note. At the trial the. court, to whom the case was tried without the intervention of a jury, found…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vanderford v. Farmers' & Mechanics' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
- United States v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Roberson v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Bank v. MatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Continental Mutual Savings Bank v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Howth v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Peter v. FinzerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- Strother v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Clem v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.