Legal Opinion

Howth v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1925No. 9441. [fn*]PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was instituted by the J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company against Henry Miller and C. W. Howth on a promissory note executed by defendants, payable to plaintiff, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien on certain farming machinery for which the note was given. No service was obtained on defendant Miller, and the suit as to him was dismissed.

The defendant Howth, among other defenses, plead discharge from liability on the note for this: That he was an accommodation maker or surety for Miller, the principal obligor, which fact was well known to the plaintiff, and that after the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Vanderford v. Farmers' & Mechanics' National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Cellers v. MeachemOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. SnoufferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Long v. MasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brinker v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. HowthTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hoffer v. Eastland Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Jefferson County Bank v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. McAfee v. Jeter & TownsendCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API