Legal Opinion

Bank v. Matson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM -WASHINGTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Washington County. John P. Smith, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The bill in this case is filed, among other things, to collect a note for $1,000 upon which defendant, A. R. Johnson, was surety for defendant, Matson. Johnson defended the action upon the ground that the bank had extended time of payment to the defendant, Matson, without his consent and to his prejudice, and thus released him from liability. The Special Chancellor in the Court below sustained the defense of Johnson, and decreed that he was released by the act of the bank. Other steps were taken in the case not necessary now to mention. The bank appealed from so much of • the Chancellor’s…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Nat. Bank v. BickelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Purcell Wholesale Grocery Co. v. LykinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API