Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1991No. 120360PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

191 Mich. App. 90 (1991)

477 N.W.2d 412

IN RE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO THE WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR (EVINA v CITY OF DETROIT)

Docket No. 120360.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided September 3, 1991, at 9:05 A.M.

John D. O'Hair, Prosecuting Attorney, Andrea Solak, Chief, Special Operations, and Charles E. Grant, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the appellant.

James A. Carlin, for the appellees.

Before: GRIFFIN, P.J., and SAWYER and BRENNAN, JJ.

SAWYER, J.

The Wayne County Prosecutor appeals from an order of the circuit court denying the prosecutor's motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum. We affirm.

Plai…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Evening News Ass'n v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Lindsay v. LipsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. GilmoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Stevens v. Inland Waters, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. People v. GilmoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum to Wayne Cty. ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Koster v. June’s Trucking, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API