Legal Opinion
Broyles v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 29, 1985No. CR 85-36PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
Tried without a jury, Broyles was convicted of DWI and other offenses. Aside from the punishment imposed, the court assessed costs of $302.25, which apparently included the “additional” costs of $250 mandated by Act 918 of 1983. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 75-2531 (Supp. 1983). The appeal comes to this court under Rule 29(l)(c).
The first of two arguments for reversal is that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Broyles was intoxicated within the statutory definition. § 75-2502 (a) (Supp. 1983). In a criminal case the standard for review is not whether the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Marshall v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Ex Parte CoffeltCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peraza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Safety Net for Abused Persons v. SeguraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- State v. ClabornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- McKay v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.