Legal Opinion
Little Rock Family Planning Services, P.A. v. Dalton
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided July 25, 1994No. LR-C-93-803PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil action for injunctive and declaratory relief under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2. Little Rock Family Planning Services and the other plaintiffs seek to have this Court declare invalid and enjoin enforcement of Amendment 68 to the Arkansas Constitution, alleging that it is in conflict with applicable federal law — the 1994 Hyde Amendment. Amendment 68 states that “No public funds will be used to pay for any abortion, except to save the…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dalton v. Little Rock Family Planning ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Hern v. BeyeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.