Legal Opinion

Crowson v. Cody

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1923No. 3 Div. 587PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The primary purpose of the bill of complaint, both originally and as amended, is to hold the respondent Cody as trustee of .the title to certain lands, and to execute the trust by a sale of the lands and a distribution of the proceeds among those alleged to have an interest therein, in 'the order of their respective priorities.

The essential facts upon which Cody’s relationship to the lands as trustee, and the equities sought to be established and satisfied, are based, are as follows: The TriState Realty Company was the owner of the lands, and executed three successive mortgages thereon, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Bingham v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Paulling v. Creagh's AdministratorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Keeble v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Kelly v. LongshoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Crowson v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Ezzell v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Griffin v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. FormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API