Legal Opinion

Crane Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1906No. 6033PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Oross-apipleals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered August 14, 1905, upon findings in favor of tbe plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on an indemnity bond.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

This is the second appeal in this case. When it was here before we held that the answer was sufficient, and that the sufficiency of the complaint was not raised on that appeal. Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co., 36 Wash. 95, 78 Pac. 460. The issue© made by the pleadings are stated in that opinion. When the case went bach, the answer .of the Aetna Indemnity Company was amended so as to deny all liability. In other respects the answer was the same as stated when it was here before. Upon the issues thus presented the case came, on for trial. The Aetna Indemnity Company objected to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Richardson v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Coats v. West Coast Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Mosher v. BruhnWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Huggins v. SutherlandWashington Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Herbert H. Conway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People ex rel. New Jersey Terra Cotta Co. v. TravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Caddo Nat. Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Lee v. Gorman Packing CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API