Legal Opinion

Lee v. Gorman Packing Corporation

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1929No. 22008. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted to recover for the breach of a contract to brail a fish trap in Alaska. The allegations of appellant’s complaint are to the effect that appellant, the owner of a fish trap in Alaska, contracted with Gorman & Company to fish the trap during the season of 1926. The option on the 1927 catch, included in the contract covering 1926, was assigned to the respondent. A copy of each of the contracts is annexed to, and made a part of, the complaint. Under § 4 of the second contract, the respondent

“ . . . agrees to brail and empty said trap not less than once during each and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Richardson v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Rieper v. General Cigar Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Weir v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Coats v. West Coast Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Larpenteur v. Eldridge Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Spokane Savings & Loan Society v. Park Vista Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Simmons v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Haan v. HeathWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hansen v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API