Legal Opinion
Huggins v. Sutherland
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 9, 1905No. 5526PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Neal, J., entered April 6, 1904, in favor of the plaintiff, upon the default of the defendants to- appear at the trial, in an action upon a contractor’s statutory bond.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.
This action was brought upon a contractor’s bond for the construction of public improvements for the town of Lind, a municipal corporation. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendants who were sureties upon the bond have appealed.
The complaint alleges two causes of action. The first is as follows:
“(1) That on the 29th day of May, 1902, defendant W. E. Sutherland made and entered into a certain contract, in writing, with the town of Lind, a municipal corporation, for the furnishing of the material and the construction of a bridge on Van Marter avenue, in the town of Lind, across the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Cascade Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Herbert H. Conway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- People ex rel. New Jersey Terra Cotta Co. v. TravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.