Legal Opinion

Stewart v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2003No. 49A02-0305-CV-408PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

After Naomi and Grant Stewart's dog, Sheba, bit a child on three different occasions, the City of Indianapolis brought suit against them for violating the ordinance addressing the way in which dangerous animals are kept. The Stewarts appeal several aspects of the trial court's decision. Because it is dispositive, we restate and address only this issue:

Whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the City on its complaint requesting an injunction and fines against the Stewarts for violating the ordinance prohibiting dangerous animals from being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reeder v. HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Poznanski Ex Rel. Poznanski v. HorvathIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wilson v. Lincoln Federal Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Plesha v. Edmonds Ex Rel. EdmondsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. EilersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flying J., Inc. v. City of New Haven, Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Board of Directors of the Bass Lake Conservancy District v. BrewerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Board of Directors of the Bass Lake Conservancy District v. BrewerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API