Moriconi v. AT & T WIRELESS PCS, LLC
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
EISELE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Docket #4). Plaintiff seeks to remand this action back to the state court from which it was removed. Over Defendant’s objection, the Court finds that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction in this case, and the case must therefore be remanded.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Cynthia Moriconi, acting individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals, originally filed suit on March 20, 2003, in the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas. On May 14, 2003, Defendant AT & T…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency Emissions Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Toller v. SAGAMORE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2008
- Varboncoeur v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
- Becnel v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2005
- Haynes v. Louisville Ladder Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.