Legal Opinion

People v. Blair

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1969No. Crim. 3611PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MITCHELL, J. pro tem. *

The defendant was charged with; (a) robbery (Pen. Code. § 211), count I; (b) kidnaping (Pen. Code, § 209) for the purpose of robbery, count II; (c) kidnaping (Pen. Code, § 209) for the purpose of robbery, count III; and (d) receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496), count IV. In a jury trial, defendant was found guilty on all four counts. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. However, the order denying a new trial is nonappealable. (People v. De Leon, 236 Cal.App.2d 530, 533 [46 Cal.Rptr. 241]; Pen.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lanza v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. North v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. MutchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Donaldson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Halpin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API