Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Szmodis v. Romney

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 69-1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUONGO, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on motion for preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs, Louis Szmodis and Pembroke, Inc., seek to enjoin the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Bethlehem Housing Authority (BHA), and C. M. Zumas and M. N. Zumas trading as C & M Zumas (Zumas) from proceeding with meetings and negotiations looking to the award of a contract for the construction of two housing projects for the elderly in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.

Prior to commencement of the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction, the Secretary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harry Friend, Doing Business as Hertz Driv-Ur-Self System, Licensee v. Frederick B. Lee, Administrator, Civil Aeronautics AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Haspel v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
  5. Harry F. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manginaro v. Welfare Fund of Local 771, IATSEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Pullman Incorporated v. VolpeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. James v. AmbroseDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API