Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 30, 1964No. Civ. 3043-CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUNZEL, District Judge.
By his amended complaint, plaintiff seeks to enjoin the United States and the individual defendants, namely: Robert S. McNamara, Secretary of Defense, Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of the Navy, and Captain D. K. Ela, Commanding Officer of the United States Naval Repair Facility, from shutting down the facility at the United States Naval Station, San Diego, California.
Plaintiff alleges he is a service electrician at the repair facility and that his action is a “class” action on behalf of all employees at the facility who are in a like situation with himself.
It is alleged that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wicks v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Wicks v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jarrett v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Jarrett v. ResorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Harry F. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- James v. AmbroseDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1973
- Ponce v. Housing Authority of County of TulareDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.