Legal Opinion
Lubetzky v. Friedman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1991No. B038108PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Plaintiff Richard Lubetzky appeals from an October 14, 1988, order denying his request for sanctions and denying his motion to tax costs on appeal of defendants Robert Friedman, Erving Friedman, Monica Friedman, and Ariel Ganezer (hereinafter referred to collectively as Friedman). Lubetzky challenged certain items of Friedman’s costs, seeking to reduce costs totaling about $514 to $215 on the ground certain expenses were excessive and unreasonable.
Factual and Procedural Background
In 1984, Lubetzky filed a tort action against defendants Robert Friedman, Erving Friedman,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Zirbes v. StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Williams v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Heppler v. J.M. Peters Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Day v. CollingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.