Legal Opinion

Solinsky v. Lincoln Savings Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lincoln County. August Special Term, 1886. E. D. Hancock, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.

L. Lipman, a merchant owing debts amounting- to about $15,000, made a deed of assignment of his stock of goods and his book accounts to IT. Solinsky, as trustee. He secured in this deed all of his creditors equally. Certain of his creditors sued out and levied attachments upon this stock of merchandise, a few hours in *370advance of the acknowledgment and registration of the deed 'of trust. A number of others sued out and levied attachments a few hours after the registration of the deed to Solinsky, and after his qualification as trustee. The pleadings make a controversy between Solinsky, as…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dickinson v. National Bank of the RepublicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Hartnett v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  4. Coale v. Moline Plow Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hunter v. SwadleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API