Legal Opinion

People v. Perez

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1968No. Crim. 286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

Our first opinion in this case is reported in 253 Cal.App.2d 288. The Supreme Court had denied appellant’s petition for a hearing, but, on the ground of failure of an appointed attorney to file a brief, later directed this court to recall the remittitur, vacate its judgment, and proceed in accordance with Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738 [18 L.Ed.2d 493, 87 S.Ct. 1396] and People v. Feggans, 67 Cal.2d 444 [62 Cal.Rptr. 419, 432 P.2d 21]. This was done, and a new attorney was appointed, as requested by appellant; he filed an opening and closing brief and made a comprehensive oral…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. RobillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. NaughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API