Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Vanpool

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1949No. 33427PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, V. C. J.

On September 9, 1946, the plaintiff, George Vanpool, was the lessee of certain premises described in his petition and situated about three miles northeast of Miami, Oklahoma. He did not reside on these premises but used a barn located thereon for storage purposes. A residence on these premises was occupied by a subtenant. At the time in question plaintiff had stored in said barn baled hay, seed wheat, and commercial fertilizer, the value of which established by the testimony was $2,445. No issue as to this valuation is presented. This barn stood approximately north and south…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Midland Valley R. Co. v. RupeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Midland Valley R. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Wichita Falls & N. W. Ry. Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Croisant v. HornerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API