Legal Opinion

Croisant v. Horner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1963No. 39997Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, William D. Horner, brought this action to recover damages for personal' injuries suffered by reason of burns on his. left leg. His petition alleged that defendants, John A. Croisant and William T. Croisant, d/b/a Croisant Cotton and Implement Company, repaired a certain tractor belonging to plaintiff’s employer and left a-paper shipping label attached to a new exhaust pipe which was installed on the tractor. Plaintiff went to defendants’ shop and’ was told that the repairs were completed.. He drove the tractor toward the farm.. After he had been driving for approximately one hour,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Angelly Ex Rel. AngellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. Jack Cooper Transport Company v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. SERVICE PIPE LINE COMPANY v. DonahueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Thompson v. VanpoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API