Legal Opinion

Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment and order of the Gen oral Term of the City Court of the city of New York, affirming » judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury and affirming an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for » new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Freedmaií, P. J.

The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the negligence of the defendant. The injuries were sustained in the course of a collision between a car of the defendant and a horse and wagon driven by the plaintiff and belonging to the firm of Cahnmann & Hoffman, of which the plaintiff was a member.

An action was brought in the Municipal Court by the members of the firm to recover damages for the injuries to the horse and wagon, which action resulted in a judgment for the plaintiffs.

Upon the trial of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Williams v. . BarkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. House v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Brown v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Lawrence v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1833

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Berg v. Third Avenue RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1903
  3. Holmes v. Ivanhoe Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  5. Hatfield v. McGinnissAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API