Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 23, 1904Published

Action by Sol Goldberg against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Per curiam

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 37 Misc. Rep. 475, 75 N. Y. Supp. 970. The explicit admission upon the trial that Goldberg drove the wagon at the time of the collision, that the action for damages to the wagon resulted from the collision, and that judgment was rendered in that action for defendant on the merits, supplies every material fact that would be disclosed upon a production of the judgment roll.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902