Legal Opinion

Berg v. Third Avenue Railroad

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 20, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by one Berg against the Third Avenue Railroad Company. On motion to set aside verdict and for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Dwyer, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages resulting from the loss of his wife’s services, occasioned by an injury sustained by her by reason of the defendant’s negligence. Upon the trial a judgment roll in an action brought by the wife against defendant, in which she recovered damages for the same injury, was, upon authority of Anderson v. Third Ave. RR., 9 Daly, 487, and against the defendant’s objection and exception, received in evidence as conclusively establishing that the wife had been injured through the defendant’s negligence. A former adjudication is binding upon parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. . BarkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Anderson v. Third Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1881
  3. Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laskowski v. People's Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Nittolo v. BrandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  3. Biczan v. WeilNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Collins v. IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API