Legal Opinion

City of Brook Park v. Americargo, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1989No. 54794PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Matia, P.J.

Defendant-appellant, Americargo, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Berea Municipal Court, which found the appellant guilty of violating Brook Park Codified Ordinance Section (“B.P.O.”) 335.05 — owner or operator of motor vehicle allowing another to drive.

The appellant is a corporation engaged in the business of providing shipping and delivery services within the municipality of Brook Park and the surrounding geographic area. This shipping and delivery is accomplished by way of truck and air transportation.

On October 8, 1986, Robert Vnuk, an employee of the appellant, was operating one of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. McNary v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Globe Mutual Casualty Co. v. TeagueOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Doherty v. Kansas City Star Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Young v. U-Haul Co. of D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. PatinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Reusch v. ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. SettlesHamilton County Municipal Court · 1990
  5. State v. GoverHamilton County Municipal Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API