Legal Opinion

State v. Settles

Hamilton County Municipal Court

Decided January 24, 1990No. C89 TRD 44550PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMark P. Painter, J.

Defendant James E. Settles has been charged with a violation of R.C. 4507.33, which states as follows: “No person shall authorize or knowingly permit a motor vehicle owned by him or under his control to be driven by any person who has no legal right to do so or whose act of driving said vehicle would violate sections 4507.01 to 4507.39, inclusive, of the Revised Code.”

The facts are not in dispute, and were adduced by the testimony of the state’s sole witness, Deputy Ronald Doyle of the Hamilton County Sheriffs Department. At the time of the incident, defendant Settles operated a commercial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulla v. StrausOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. City of Cincinnati v. ChristyOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. City of Brook Park v. Americargo, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. CampbellFindlay Municipal Court · 1968
  5. State v. MillerCincinnati Municipal Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GoverHamilton County Municipal Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API