Legal Opinion
Permutit Co. v. Paige & Jones Chemical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 5, 1927No. 183PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
A preliminary injunction has been granted for infringement of claim 5 of the patent in suit, No. 1,-195,923, issued August 22, 1916, now owned by the appellee. Claims 1 and 5 of the patent have heretofore been sustained in this court in Permutit v. Harvey Laundry Co., 279 F. 713, and in the Sixth Circuit in Permutit v. Wadham et al., 13 F.(2d) 454.
This injunction was granted upon motion, supported by affidavits; no testimony having boon taken. The patent relates to zeolite water softeners. The softeners produce a water which is completely free from hardening constituents…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Permutit Co. v. WadhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Permutit Co. v. Harvey Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Permutit Co. v. Graver CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- Noma Electric Corp. v. Leo Pollock Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Willcox & Gibbs Sewing Mach. Co. v. Union Special Mach. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1928