Legal Opinion

Permutit Co. v. Wadham

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1926No. 4105PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

This is the usual infringement suit based on claims 1 and 5 of patent 1,195,923, issued August 22,1916, to Robert Gans, a German citizen, for a device for softening water.

The patent has been sustained upon final hearing in the Western District of New York, and, upon appeal, by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, and again upon motion for preliminary injunction in the Southern District of New York. A full statement of the situation will be found in the opinions of Judge Hazel in the first of these eases (274 F. 937), of Judge Mantón for the Circuit Court of Appeals in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Permutit Co. v. Harvey Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. Goshen Sweeper Co. of Grand Rapids v. Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  5. Lamb Knit Goods Co. v. Lamb Glove & Mitten Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. France Mfg. Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. Foxboro Co. v. Taylor Instrument CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. United Chromium, Inc. v. International Silver Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Bendix Corp. v. Balax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Sun Ray Gas Corp. v. Bellows-Claude Neon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API