Bloodsworth v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the court are two motions filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc. (“Smith & Nephew”): (1) a motion for summary judgment; and (2) a motion to strike Plaintiffs’ expert disclosure and to exclude the expert opinion testimony. (Doc. Nos.37-38.) In this products liability lawsuit, involving an alleged defective component of a prosthetic hip replacement system, Smith & Nephew has moved for summary judgment and to exclude expert opinion testimony on the ground that Plaintiffs’ sole proposed expert, Donald F. Hodurski,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rockhill-Anderson v. Deere & Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014
- Clarendon America Insurance v. Bayside Restaurant, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
- Edwards v. Deere & Company, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019