Legal Opinion
Jeffrey Todd Cooley v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided November 3, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00056Unknown
1Opinion
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JEFFREY TODD COOLEY, § § Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No. 4:25-cv-56 § Judge Mazzant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD § COMPANY, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) (Dkt. #15). Having considered the Motion, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #15) should be GRANTED. BACKGROUND I. Factual Background Plaintiff Jeffrey Todd…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Gonzalez v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.