Legal Opinion
Henson v. C. Overaa & Company
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 2015No. A139966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DONDERO, J.
INTRODUCTION
This appeal arises out of a dispute over the meaning of certain provisions of the “Prevailing Wage Law” and Shelley-Maloney Apprentice Labor Standards Act of 1939 (Shelley-Malony Act) 1 relating to the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Floyd Henson, Gabriel Maestretti, and Leonard Minor (appellants) assert that C. Overaa & Company (respondent) violated the statutes by hiring construction craft laborer (laborer) apprentices instead of pipe fitter apprentices to work on the construction of certain water treatment plants. 2 Appellants are pipe…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- MacIsaac v. Waste Management Collection & Recycling, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Prang v. L.A. County Assessment Appeals Bd. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Santa Clarita Org. for Planning etc. v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Trunzo v. Herling CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015