Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1901No. 2518PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Ho statement required.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON", Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted, and convicted for subornation of perjury, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

The indictment was returned in Collingsworth County and, on change of venue, tried in Hardeman County. Motion was made to quash the indictment for various reasons, in that it does not charge perjury on the part of Earp, who is charged to have been suborned by appellant, because it fails to allege the materiality of the testimony of Earp before the grand jury. It is alleged that it was a material question to know…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMurtry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Buller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Harden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Brinkley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API