Legal Opinion

Martinez v. City of Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1993No. 3-92-173-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARROLL, Chief Justice.

Armando Z. Martinez and Hortencia 0. Martinez, appellants, bring a limited appeal challenging, as unconstitutional, the ethnic and racial composition of the jury in their wrongful-death suit against the City of Austin. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.

BACKGROUND

Appellants and other family members brought a wrongful-death action against the City for the shooting death of their son, Arthur. Based upon the jury’s verdict, the trial court rendered judgment that the plaintiffs take nothing on their wrongful-death claim. The trial court did hold the City liable for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Hightower v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Mendoza v. Ranger Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. Watson, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2000
  2. Jesse Sedillo A/K/A Jesse Sedillo, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API