Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. Ranger Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 1988No. 2-87-210-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FENDER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a workers’ compensation case tried before a jury primarily on the issue of the extent and duration of an injury. The trial court, based on the jury’s answers to special issues, held appellant, Mary Mendoza, incurred total incapacity for a duration of four weeks. Appellant appeals from this adverse jury verdict.

We reverse and remand.

At the conclusion of the initial voir dire by the court and prior to impaneling of the jury, appellant’s counsel moved for a mistrial and requested that a new panel of prospective jurors be drawn because a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Willie B. Brooks v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. Hightower v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. JacksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pitman v. Lightfoot, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  2. Carr v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Jackson v. WILLIAMS BROS. CONST. CO., INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Wells v. Barrow, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. BNSF Railway Company v. Stacy Wipff, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API