Legal Opinion

National Data Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 23, 2001No. 97-23T, 97-580TPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

For most of the period from 1962 through 1985, a taxpayer who acquired qualifying machinery and equipment for use in its trade or business was allowed an “investment tax credit” as a dollar-for-dollar offset against its income tax liability, in an amount equal to a specified percentage of its investment. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the Reform Act), Pub.L. No. 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085, generally *25eliminated this credit for property placed in service after December 31,1985. But, as tax acts are wont to do, the Reform Act contained transitional rules, among them an exception…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Grapevine Imports, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Usibelli Coal Mine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Estate of Rubinstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API