Poppenberg v. R. M. Owen & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion by the plaintiff for a new trial after a verdict in favor of the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The plaintiff moves for a new trial on the ground of alleged errors claimed to have been committed by the court on the trial of this action.
The complaint set forth eight causes of action upon a contract entered into between the parties to this action, nearly-all of which were either -admitted by the pleadings or conceded upon the trial. There was, however, a controversy touching the right of the plaintiff to a reduction on the list price of certain automobiles made in July, 1911. The main contro*128versy arose out of the contract between the parties, dated June 30, 1910. By the terms of this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Ward v. Hudson River Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Caesar v. . RubinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Hicks v. British America Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Todd v. . GambleNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nederlandse Draadindustrie NDI B v. v. Grand Pre-Stressed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Bourjois, Inc. v. McGowanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- Stewart v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Torkomian v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- In re Liberty Doll Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.