Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Hansen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1923No. 3858PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

Tbe plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for *282tbe breach of a contract of sale of an automobile. The contract is in writing, and, in view that the only material question that is involved is the measure of damages that should be applied, it is not necessary to refer to either the pleadings or the findings of the court except to state that the court found that there was a binding contract entered into by the parties in which the plaintiff agreed to sell and the defendant agreed to buy an automobile at a stipulated price; that the delivery of the automobile was tendered by plaintiff…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Holland v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Charles Street Garage Co. v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Breding v. Champlain Marine & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. A. Lenobel, Inc. v. SenifAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API