Legal Opinion
Bourjois, Inc. v. McGowan
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 19, 1935No. 1559PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This suit is brought to recover $13,-918.39 paid by the plaintiff as additional tax on cosmetic and toilet preparations for the month of September, 1932.
The plaintiff was incorporated in 1929 under the name of International Perfume Company. A change to the present name was made in 1930. Barbara Gould, Limited, a corporation engaged in manufacturing beauty and treatment lines, was legally merged with plaintiff on August 9, 1932. On the last-mentioned day, Bourjois Sales Corporation and Barbara Gould Sales Corporation were incorporated. The plaintiff at all times since…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Campana Corporation v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Inecto, Inc. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. v. the NortunaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Webber v. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Williams v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.