Legal Opinion

Moore v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 28, 2017No. 15–797PublishedCited by 221 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

Bobby James Moore fatally shot a store clerk during a botched robbery. He was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. Moore challenged his death sentence on the ground that he was intellectually disabled and therefore exempt from execution. A state habeas court made detailed factfindings and determined that, under this Court's decisions in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 , 122 S.Ct. 2242 , 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), and Hall v. Florida, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1986 , 188 L.Ed.2d 1007 (2014), Moore qualified as intellectually disabled. For that reason, the court concluded, Moore's…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by221 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Shoop v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. People v. WoodruffCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Charles Williams v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  5. Moore v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API