Legal Opinion
In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 19, 2013No. 12 Misc. 381PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
The Government moves to compel compliance with grand jury subpoenas seeking foreign bank account information from five taxpayers. Each of those individuals resists compliance, asserting the act of production privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment. The Government counters that the Required Records doctrine applies and negates the act of production privilege. For the following reasons, the Government’s motion to compel compliance with its subpoenas duces tecum is granted.
BACKGROUND
Benjamin Franklin cogently…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Various Grand Jury SubpoenasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Various Grand Jury SubpoenasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In Re Application of GORSOAN LIMITED and GAZPROMBANK OJSC for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to Conduct Discovery v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020