In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Respondent Subject E renews her motion to purge contempt. For the following reasons, Subject E’s motion is denied without prejudice, and, the commencement, of sanctions is suspended until April 24, 2017.
BACKGROUND
On January 24, 2017, this Court held Subject E in civil contempt, and imposed sanctions to take effect at a later date, for her failure to obtain and produce bank records pursuant to a grand jury subpoena (the “Sanctions Order”). See In re Various Grand Jury Subpoenas, 235 F.Supp.3d 472, 2017 WL 361685. (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2017).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- CBS Broadcasting Inc. v. FilmOn.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- In re Various Grand Jury SubpoenasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In Re Two Grand Jury Subpoenae Duces Tecum Dated August 21Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rigby v. Mastro (In Re Mastro)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018