Legal Opinion
Anderson Hay and Grain Co. v. Dunn
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1970No. 8951PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TACKETT, Justice.
This action was commenced in the District Court of Lincoln County, New Mexico, to recover $13,567.85 allegedly owed plaintiff hy defendant Virgil Welch and Sam Dunn, doing business as Ruidoso' Downs Concession, also known as Ruidoso Downs Feed Concession. The trial court swarded judgment against Welch and dismissed the complaint against Dunn. Plaintiff appeals.
The only issue before this court is whether Dunn was a partner in the operation of the Ruidoso Downs Feed Concession. The evidence reveals that Dunn was a partner by estoppel as a matter of law. The trial court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Kelley Island Lime & Transport Co. v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Davis v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- McBriety v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Vlamis v. De WeeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Union Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Ag Services of America, Inc. v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Cheesecake Factory, Inc. v. BainesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Recreational Data Services, Inc. v. Trimble Navigation LimitedAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.