National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Albert
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The policy sued on contains the following clause: “No obligation is assumed by the company prior to the date hereof, nor unless on said date the insured is alive and in sound health.” This court has considered such terms of insurance policies to be in legal effect warranties, and governed by the principles of law applicable to warranties. Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. Sneed, 217 Ala. 669, 117 So. 307; Cotton States Life Ins. Co. v. Crozier, 216 Ala. 539, 113 So. 615; Southern Life & Health Ins. Co. v. Morgan, 216 Ala. 529, 113 So. 540; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Mandelbaum, 207 Ala. 234, 92 So. 440,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MandelbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. SeabornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. SneedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. RigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Frierson v. FrazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisiana State Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. SaffoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932