Legal Opinion

Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. Sneed

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1928No. 8 Div. 844PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

This court has often considered and stated the distinction between warranties which are contractual terms of a policy of insurance, and usually promissory in form, and representations, which are matters of inducement merely, and usually relate to presently existing facts or conditions. Ala. Gold Life Ins. Co. v. Johnston, 80 Ala. 467, 470, 2 So. 125, 128, 59 Am. Rep. 816; Mut. Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. Lehman, 132 Ala. 640, 32 So. 733; Kelly v. Life Ins. Clearing Co., 113 Ala. 453, 21 So. 361; Sov. Camp, W. O. W., v. Hutchinson, 214 Ala. 540, 542, 108 So. 520; Brotherhood, etc., v. Riggins, 214…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WolffSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Jordan & Sons v. PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. United States Life Insurance v. LesserSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  4. Empire Life Insurance v. GeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Independent Life Ins. Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. New York Life Ins. v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. ZivitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Henry M. Apperson v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API