Legal Opinion

State v. Decosta

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 9, 2001No. 99-249PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

After a jury trial in Superior Court (Morrill, J.), the defendant, Dana DeCosta, was convicted of one count of aggravated felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A:2 (1996) (amended 1999), one count of felonious sexual assault, see RSA 632-A-.3 (1996) (amended 1997), six charges of giving an alcoholic beverage or liquor to a minor, see RSA 179:5 (1994), and one charge of exhibiting or otherwise making available obscene material, see RSA 650:2 (1996). On appeal, he argues that: (1) the trial court erroneously allowed an expert to testify about child sexual abuse accommodation *407syndrome; (2) the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert David VillardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. State v. CresseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. EllisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. HermsdorfSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. State v. BussiereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Murray v. Developmental Services of Sullivan County, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. SanchezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Gregory CollinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. State v. FleetwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API